|
Título:
|
Testing the suitability of different high-performance liquid chromatographic methods to determine aflatoxin M1 in a soft fresh Italian cheese
|
|
Autores:
|
CATTANEO, T. M. P., Autor ;
MARINONI, L., Autor ;
BARZAGHI, S., Autor ;
CREMONESI, K., Autor ;
MONTI, L., Autor
|
|
Tipo de documento:
|
documento electrónico
|
|
Fecha de publicación:
|
2011
|
|
ISBN/ISSN/DL:
|
69257
|
|
Dimensiones:
|
pp. 4738-4745
|
|
Nota general:
|
En: Journal of Chromatography A No 1218 (2011)
|
|
Langues:
|
Inglés
|
|
Clasificación:
|
CROMATOGRAFÍA LÍQUIDA
QUESO
TOXICOLOGÍA DE LOS ALIMENTOS
|
|
Resumen:
|
Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) is a toxic undesirable compound in milk. AFM1 affinity for caseins causes a concentration effect during milk process for dairy transformation. In spite of this, no official method of analysis, nor maximum tolerance level for aflatoxin M1 in cheese have been established. Thus, the aim of this work was to test the suitability of different HPLC methods for the AFM1 quantification in soft cheese samples at three different contamination levels (low, medium and high, at respectively nearly 30, 100 and 250 ng/kg). Nine participants were selected among Italian laboratories accredited by the Italian accreditation body (ACCREDIA) for HPLC toxin analysis. They were asked to analyze samples applying the method routinely used. The different applied methods were compared, and precision and accuracy parameters were evaluated. The main differences among HPLC procedures were registered at the level of extraction step. The use of an enzymatic digestion for the extraction of the toxin from cheese seemed to be particularly advantageous and the use of immunoaffinity columns seemed to be determinant for the improvement of sensitivity at low contamination levels. In general, the applied methods well discriminated the 3 levels of contamination, even though they performed better at the medium and high concentration levels (100 and 250 ng/kg) than at the low one (30 ng/kg). In fact relative standard deviation for reproducibility at low level was higher (60.1%) than the same value at medium and high levels (22.8% and 28.9%, respectively).
|
